Australia - Information Sheet

Public Sector Information Sheet 3 - Portable storage devices and personal information handling

PDF (890KB)

Key Messages

This information sheet suggests a number of steps Australian and ACT Government agencies should consider taking to help safeguard personal information stored or handled on portable storage devices. 

What is a portable storage device?

A portable storage device ('PSD') is defined in this information sheet as a small, lightweight, portable, easy to use device, which is capable of storing and transferring large volumes of data. Common PSDs include portable external hard drives, CDs/DVDs, USB keys, laptops/ notebooks, personal digital assistants (such as Pocket PC, Palm, BlackBerry), and devices with in-built accessible storage (such as MP3 players, iPods, and mobile phones).

What privacy risks are presented by PSDs?

According to a survey on PSD use conducted on behalf of the Office of the Privacy Commissioner in 2009, PSDs are widely used across Australian Government agencies. 

The use of PSDs to handle personal information raises a number of privacy risks related to personal information storage and security. These include that personal information stored on a PSD may be compromised through the operation of malicious software or the PSD may be lost or stolen.  Such risks arise from the technical capabilities of PSDs (high storage, fast speed of transfer and 'plug and play' functionality) along with their physical characteristics (small size, light weight, low cost, high portability). 

The steps suggested in this information sheet may assist agencies to better manage personal information held by an agency that may be stored or handled on a PSD.   These steps may also help agencies covered by the Privacy Act 1988 to meet their obligations under Information Privacy Principle 4(a).

What can agencies do to enhance the security of personal information on PSDs?

Key steps which Australian and ACT Government agencies may consider taking include:

  1. Undertake regular risk assessments of PSDs used in the work environment.
  2. Ensure the agency has documented policies that apply to PSDs used in the work environment.
  3. Promote active staff awareness, including through formal staff training, about these policies and other procedures applying to PSDs.
  4. Install appropriate software controls.
  5. Develop and implement an effective and timely response procedure for security breaches.

Agencies should also consider addressing in their policies and practices, the specific risks associated with any use of privately owned PSDs in the work environment and any use of PSDs when working remotely.

Background

Who is this information sheet for?

This information sheet has been developed for Australian and ACT Government agencies, where agency staff use portable storage devices ('PSDs') to store or handle personal information[1]

What is a PSD?

A PSD is defined in this information sheet as a small, lightweight, portable, easy to use device, which is capable of storing and transferring large volumes of data. Common PSDs include portable external hard drives, CDs/DVDs, USB keys[2], laptops/ notebooks, personal digital assistants (such as Pocket PC, Palm, BlackBerry), and devices with in-built accessible storage (such as MP3 players, iPods, and mobile phones).

What is this information sheet about?

A survey on PSD use in Australian Government agencies conducted on behalf of the Office of the Privacy Commissioner in 2009 shows that PSDs are widely used across Australian Government agencies[3]

This information sheet aims to assist Australian and ACT government agencies to minimise the privacy risks associated with storing and handling personal information on PSDs.  These include that personal information handled on a PSD may be compromised through the operation of malicious software or the PSD may be lost or stolen.

The information sheet outlines some steps agencies may consider taking in relation to PSDs issued for work purposes, as well as privately owned PSDs used at work. 

These steps may help agencies covered by the Privacy Act 1988 (the 'Privacy Act') to meet their obligations under Information Privacy Principle 4(a) ('IPP4(a)').  IPP4(a) provides that agencies need to ensure that a record in their possession or control containing personal information, is protected by reasonable security safeguards against loss, unauthorised access, use, modification, disclosure or other misuse.  

To ensure ongoing compliance with IPP4(a), it will be important for agencies to take account of whether particular PSDs offer appropriate security safeguards when reviewing their IT procurement needs.

Agencies should also consult with their IT managers before deciding on particular software, hardware, access and other controls for PSDs used within their agencies.

How does this information sheet interact with other legislative obligations and standards applying to PSDs?

Agencies also need to comply with any other applicable legislative obligations or standards applying to PSDs.  These may include the Australian Government Protective Security Manual (the 'PSM') and the Australian Government Information and Communications Technology Security Manual ('ISM'). 

In general terms, the PSM provides minimum security standards that agencies need to meet for the protection of Australian Government resources, including information, personnel and assets[4].  The ISM provides minimum security requirements and guidance to assist in the protection of official government information that is processed, stored or communicated by Australian Government information systems[5].

This information sheet is not intended to replace the standards in the PSM or the ISM.  Instead, it has a different focus - on reasonable security safeguards for protecting personal information stored or handled on PSDs. 

How can agencies enhance the security of personal information on PSDs?

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner (the 'Office') has identified five interrelated steps, which may help agencies to enhance the security of personal information stored or handled on PSDs: 

  1. Risk assessment
  2. Documented policies
  3. Active staff awareness
  4. Appropriate software controls
  5. Effective response to security breaches

Step one - risk assessment

Agencies are encouraged to regularly assess the privacy risks associated with using PSDs to handle personal information in their workplace. 

This risk assessment should have three main purposes.  Firstly, it should identify the risks of using PSDs across an agency's different activities or operations.  Secondly, it should allow an agency to evaluate the likelihood and the consequences of these risks occurring.  Finally, it should help agencies to put in place safeguards, tailored to the agency's activities or operations, to manage the privacy risks associated with using PSDs.

The risks arising from using PSDs may differ within agencies, depending on the circumstances.  Different parts of an agency may therefore need to put in place different safeguards to address the identified risks.

In assessing these risks, an agency may wish to consider the following factors, which are illustrated by examples.  These factors are provided as a general guide, and are not exhaustive. 

Step two - documented policies

All Australian Government agencies surveyed in the Office's survey on PSD use indicated that they provide access to or issue PSDs to staff[6].  However, not all of these agencies have specific policies in place that apply to PSDs and many of these policies do not cover all types of PSDs[7]

A documented policy that sets out how staff may use PSDs at work can address some of the risks associated with PSDs that have been identified in the risk assessment. 

Some of the key factors for agencies to consider when assessing whether their policy appropriately safeguards personal information stored or handled on a PSD are listed below.   These factors are not in order of importance, nor are they exhaustive.  Agencies should consider all the factors together before deciding what their policy needs to cover to address their own particular risks.  

For the policy to be effective, staff should be familiar with its terms.  It is also important for agencies to actively audit compliance with the policy and to take appropriate disciplinary action in the event of a breach.

Example: Ensuring a policy covers all types of PSDs used in the workplace.

An agency has an IT security policy that applies to USB keys and CDs/ DVDs.  

Many staff within the agency no longer store information on USB keys or CDs/ DVDs, but use personal digital assistants (such as Pocket PC, Palm, BlackBerry) to handle such information, due to the increased functionality of these PSDs.  The agency's policy does not apply to personal digital assistants.  As such, the policy does not address any risks specific to these PSDs which may include risks arising from synchronization capabilities and, in some cases, Bluetooth wireless connectivity.

The agency's policy has not kept pace with developments in IT use.  The agency should have undertaken regular reviews of the types of PSDs being used in the workplace, and assessed whether its policy adequately addressed any additional risks associated with using these PSDs.

Step three - active staff awareness

Staff need to be aware of the terms of any applicable policies, practices or procedures applying to PSDs to be able to comply with them. 

The Office's survey on PSD use indicated that most Australian Government agencies provide training for staff on the use of agency issued PSDs in the form of on-the-job training[8]

This could be supplemented with formal training sessions to ensure a consistent message is conveyed to staff members about the policies, practices and procedures applying to PSDs. 

Where possible, an initial training session should occur before issuing staff with a PSD (or where permitted before staff may use privately owned PSDs in the workplace) and at regular intervals afterwards.

Some of the relevant issues to discuss with staff at PSD training sessions are outlined below.

One way to confirm that staff understand the messages conveyed in the training session is to ask them to sign an 'Acceptable Use Agreement' at the end of the session.  The Agreement should confirm that staff understand and consent to the responsibilities and obligations outlined in the training.

In addition, agencies should have ongoing activities to promote up-to-date staff awareness. This could include reminding staff during staff meetings, by email or in a staff bulletin of their obligations under the policy, referring to any limitations on PSD use in a computer logon banner, and reminding staff of where they can review the policy.

Example:  Facilitating staff awareness about applicable policies.

Paul works in the Sydney office of a large agency, with many offices across Australia.  The agency's information security policy expressly prohibits sending a USB key in the mail.  The policy is available on the agency's intranet, but staff generally don't know what it says.

The agency keeps a record of individuals' names, addresses and tax file numbers on a database which can only be accessed from the Sydney office's network.  One day, Lillianna, who works in the agency's Melbourne office, asks Paul to send her a copy of some of that information. 

As Paul is not aware of the policy, he downloads the relevant information onto a USB key and sends it to Lillianna by post.  Two weeks later Lillianna rings Paul to say the USB key has not arrived.

Paul realises that in this period, personal information on the USB key could have been accessed and mishandled by an unauthorised user.  If Paul and other agency staff had been given training and regular reminders about the policy, this may have been averted.

Step four - appropriate software controls

'Software controls' involve installing specific control software, firewalls, system policies, or operating system controls.  They can act as an important safeguard against loss, unauthorised access, use, modification, disclosure or other misuse of personal information.   

Set out below are a number of software controls agencies may consider adopting to enhance the security of personal information stored or handled on PSDs.  In determining whether these software controls are suitable for a particular agency consideration should be given to the operating requirements of the agency's IT platform, the functionality of the particular PSD and the agency's risk assessment.

Step five - effective response to security breaches

There are many different ways in which personal information stored on a PSD may be compromised.   For example, malicious software may be installed on a staff member's laptop, a mobile phone may be mislaid at the airport, or a staff member's USB key may be stolen. 

Agencies should therefore ensure they have policies and procedures applying to all PSDs used in the workplace that outline what to do in the event of a security breach. 

Agencies may wish to review the Office's advisory Guide to Handling Personal Information Security Breaches (available on the Office's website). This provides general guidance on key steps and factors to consider when responding to a personal information security breach. 

What privacy considerations apply to using privately owned PSDs at work?

In this information sheet, a 'privately owned PSD' is any PSD used by a staff member which has not been issued (or to which access has not been provided) by their agency.

According to the Office's survey on PSD use, most Australian Government agencies do not prohibit staff from using any type of privately owned PSDs at work, or only prohibit the use of some privately owned PSDs (mainly privately owned laptops and notebooks)[9]. Further, almost half of Australian Government agencies surveyed do not have specific policies in place to govern the use of privately owned PSDs at work[10].

A number of risks could arise from allowing staff to do this. 

For example, a staff member could upload personal information stored on the agency's IT network, onto a privately owned PSD.  Once uploaded, it would be difficult for the agency to track how this information is used and disclosed.  The information could be shared with unauthorised users or if it is downloaded onto another computer, accessed by non-agency staff such as the individual's house mates. 

Also, a privately owned PSD could introduce malware onto the agency's network, compromising its IT system.  

Example: Compromising the network.

Ping works at an agency which holds a large number of clients' banking details on its network.  On her way to work, she is handed a brand new USB key at the train station as part of a promotion.

At work, Ping plugs the USB key into her laptop and accesses the agency's network.  Unfortunately she does not know that the USB key has been programmed to communicate information from her agency's network to an external server outside the agency's network.

Once plugged in, the USB key facilitates the transfer of information, including the clients' banking details, to external servers.

Where the likelihood of these risks occurring is high or the consequences would be significant, an agency may need to adopt a strict approach to minimise the risks associated with privately owned PSDs.  This may involve prohibiting the use of privately owned PSDs at work, or prohibiting their use to handle personal information.

Alternatively, an agency could consider using hardware controls to prevent PSDs accessing the agency's network, by physically disabling, removing or sealing access ports, or by using non-standard locking ports.  In considering this option, agencies should be aware that such measures should only be used where there are significant risks associated with privately owned PSDs, as they may prevent staff from legitimately using agency issued PSDs.

If an agency allows staff to use privately owned PSDs at work, it should explain how it expects them to be used.  This should be specifically covered in staff awareness activities (discussed at Step 3). 

An agency's policies should also aim to address the privacy risks outlined above.  For example, a policy could provide that:

What privacy considerations apply to working remotely?

'Working remotely' covers a range of situations in which staff undertake their daily work activities away from the office.  This may be because of work-related travel, home-based working arrangements (telecommuting), or working from a location other than the office.

In many cases, working remotely will involve using a PSD to handle information for work purposes, whether that PSD is a privately owned PSD or an agency issued PSD.

While it can be convenient for agencies and staff and, due to technological advancements is occurring more frequently, there are also a broad range of privacy risks associated with working remotely.  These include:

Example: Risks in storing personal information on a PSD when working remotely.

Justin, who works for an agency, needs to review a report which refers to an individual's criminal record.  He decides to finish this work at home so he uploads the report from the agency's network onto a laptop issued to him by the agency. 

On the way home, Justin stops in at the grocery store and, forgetting that he has the laptop with him, leaves it in plain view on the back seat of his car.  While he is gone, the laptop is stolen.

There are a number of things Justin could have done to handle this situation better.  Firstly, he should have considered whether it was appropriate to store a report containing such sensitive information on his laptop and take it out of the office. Secondly, Justin should have ensured that the report was protected by strong access controls, such as password protection and encryption, when storing it on his laptop.   Finally, Justin should have kept the laptop with him at all times, or at least ensured it was secured out of sight such as by locking it in the boot of his car.

The privacy risks related to working remotely can be minimised by developing an appropriate policy that specifically addresses these risks. Some of the key factors which an agency may consider including in a working remotely policy include:

The agency should also explain to staff who work remotely the privacy risks of doing so, what is expected of staff when working remotely, the terms of any working remotely policy and the terms of any applicable PSD policy.

The privacy risks associated with working remotely may also be reduced by providing staff who work remotely with an agency issued PSD.  In this way the agency can more easily standardise the software, access controls and other safeguards on the PSD. 

Further information

For further information, please see the following publications (available on the Office's website):

Public Sector Information Sheets

Information sheets are advisory only and are not legally binding. The Information Privacy Principles ('IPPs') in section 14 of the Privacy Act legally bind agencies.

Information sheets are based on the Office of the Privacy Commissioner's understanding of how the Privacy Act works. They provide explanations of some of the terms used in the IPPs and good practice or compliance tips. They are intended to help agencies apply the IPPs in ordinary circumstances. Agencies may need to seek legal advice on the application of the Privacy Act to their particular situation. Nothing in an information sheet limits the Privacy Commissioner's ability to investigate complaints under the Privacy Act or to apply the IPPs in the way that seems most appropriate to the facts of the case being dealt with. Agencies may also wish to consult the Privacy Commissioner's guidelines and other information sheets.

Office of the Privacy Commissioner

Privacy Enquiries Line 1300 363 992 - local call (calls from mobile and pay phones may incur higher charges)

TTY 1800 620 241 - no voice calls; Fax + 61 2 9284 9666; GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001.

Public Sector Information Sheet 3 

Web HTML and PDF published  May 2009

ISBN 978-1-877079-67-2

© Commonwealth of Australia 2009

http://www.privacy.gov.au/



[1] 'Personal information' is defined in section 6(1) of the Privacy Act as 'information or an opinion, whether true or not, about an individual whose identity is apparent or can be reasonably ascertained from that information'.

[2] A 'USB key' is also known as a 'flash drive', 'USB stick', 'memory stick' or 'memory key'.

[3] See Portable Storage Devices and Australian Government Agencies: Personal Information Survey 2009, question 25 (http://www.privacy.gov.au/).  The survey was designed by the Office based on a similar survey undertaken by the Office of the Victorian Privacy Commissioner in 2008.

[4] For further information on the Australian Government Protective Security Manual, see www.ag.gov.au/

[5] For further information on Australian Government Information and Communications Technology Security Manual (designated ACSI 33), see www.dsd.gov.au/library/infosec/ism.html.  

[6] See Portable Storage Devices and Australian Government Agencies: Personal Information Survey 2009, question 25 (http://www.privacy.gov.au/).

[7] See Portable Storage Devices and Australian Government Agencies: Personal Information Survey 2009, question 27 (http://www.privacy.gov.au/).

[8] See Portable Storage Devices and Australian Government Agencies: Personal Information Survey 2009, questions 35 - 36 (http://www.privacy.gov.au/).

[9] See Portable Storage Devices and Australian Government Agencies: Personal Information Survey 2009, questions 66 - 67 (http://www.privacy.gov.au/).

[10] See Portable Storage Devices and Australian Government Agencies: Personal Information Survey 2009, question 78 (http://www.privacy.gov.au/).

Office of the privacy Commissioner Hong Kong logo Office of the Privacy Commissioner New Zealand logo Office of the Privacy Commissioner Australia logo Office of the New South Wales Privacy Commissioner logo Office of the Victorian Privacy Commisioner logo Office of the Privacy Commissioner Northern Territory logoOffice of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada / Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada logoKorea Information Security Agency logoOffice of the Information and Privacy Commissioner British Columbia logo